![]() ![]() She’s like an ambassador from a world where hard times make you stronger, but they’re still to be avoided where you escape your past not by running away but by planting a ladder where you stand and climbing up. As she tells it, Dolly the multimillionaire and international star is a direct product of Dolly the little girl, who decided to model herself after the local hooker in the backwoods-Tennessee town where she grew up. Nothing more no studio trickery, no trip hop drum breaks. “It costs a lot to look this cheap,” she likes to say. Simple premise: Dolly Partons Jolene slipped from 45 to 33 rpm. She’s never tried to hide or apologize for her tackiness or her self-sculpting. Even “I Will Always Love You” (lest we forget, a Parton composition long before Whitney), is both a love song and a breakup song.Īnd then there’s Parton herself, with breasts like launching missiles and the wardrobe of a seven-year-old with resources. Many of her songs float lightly on dark currents-if you scan her compositions from the past fifty years, you’ll find plenty of dying children, abandoned women, and paralyzing poverty dished up in catchy tunes and warbling tones. Dolly Partons hit song 'Jolene' (from her 1973 album sharing the same name) sounds unexpectedly good when slowed down to 33 RPM. That’s how Dolly Parton works, both as a musician and a celebrity. Slowing these songs down can be a fun exercise in trying to figure out how James composes a song, or otherwise just a new way to appreciate his music.Of course, that can be found in the original version, but the brisk clip of the performance and the chime of Dolly’s voice bounce over the concreteness of the despair. Instead of 33 minutes, you actually get 45, you understand? And there you have it, an album of standard length.” (Source)Īphex Twin records are incredibly complex, multi-layered, rule-breaking and mind-shattering and slowing them down not only changes the feel of the song, it actually allows your brain to more easily pick out and process each layer. That’s also the real reason why my album ended up so short. Dolly afirma que Jolene es la canción que escribió y que ha sido la. Algunos oyentes incluso compararon el resultado final con las voces de Cher y Tracy Chapman. If they go for too long, then they don’t fit onto the vinyl-and then you can’t play them slower. Si bien esto conduce a sonidos extraños, reducir la canción de Dolly Parton Jolene a 33 RPM (revoluciones por minuto) crea una versión diferente pero impresionante. That’s also why my pieces are so short: you can only press them onto maxi singles if they are short at 45 rpm. “Many of my tracks are better if you play them at 33 rpm. James explained in an interview that a lot of his music is meant to be played slower than it appears on his records. As Andrea DenHoed notes in The New Yorker, Slow Ass Jolene, below, transforms Parton’s baby-high soprano into something deep, soulful and seemingly, male. And to make things even weirder, she kind of sounds just like Jay-Z.īack in ’96, Richard D. A 45 of Dolly Parton’s 1973 hit Jolene played at 33RPM not only sounds cool, it also manages to change the meaning, if only through the actual sound of her voice. This could be considered a new genre of music. It seems ridiculous at first but some of these tunes are actually really intricately crafted pop/electronic songs, and slowing them down helps to distinguish all the layers within them. Playing Jolene vinyl record slowed down to 33 rpm and soloing guitar on top of it. Seriously, don’t be so quick to skip this one. At any moment I could drop into a different level of time.” (Source) ![]() So I could slip into half-time I could slip into a third of a time. 0 views, 480 likes, 6 loves, 83 comments, 308 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from : Dolly Partons 'Jolene' played at 33 RPM has an unexpected. “All the music in the score is subdivisions and multiplications of the tempo of the Édith Piaf track. Playing off the concept of time-dilation used in the film, Zimmer explained how he constructed the score in an interview with The New York Times:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |